Green Party of Canada co-leader Jonathan Pedneault has drawn criticism for his sweeping call for censorship, as Dimitri Lascaris has publicly challenged the logic behind Pedneault’s position.
As reported by Global Green News, Pedneault recently suggested Canada should block access to platforms like Facebook and Fox News while taking stronger action against so-called “Trumpian propaganda organs.” His comments, which include advocating for a diplomatic offensive and forming new military alliances, have been widely interpreted as aligning with an aggressive national security hawkish posture rather than promoting diplomacy.
Lascaris, a well-known anti-war advocate and runner-up in the 2020 Green Party of Canada leadership race, took to X (formerly Twitter) to denounce Pedneault’s stance, stating:
“I’m as critical of Facebook and Fox News as anybody, but censorship is not the answer.
Why does Green Party co-leader Jonathan Pedneault have so little confidence in the ability of Canadians to discern truth from falsehood?
Why does he presume to have a better grasp of truth than the average citizen?
And why is he focusing on Facebook and Fox News without condemning the rampant propaganda on CNN, CTV, MSNBC, the CBC and Postmedia?
Evidently, Pedneault has no problem with propaganda—as long as it aligns with his own world view.”
Lascaris’s response directly challenges Pedneault’s selective approach to censorship, pointing out the hypocrisy of calling for bans on right-wing media while ignoring the mainstream Canadian and American media’s role in pushing establishment narratives.
A Pattern of Controversial Statements
This isn’t the first time Pedneault’s approach to security and foreign policy has sparked controversy. His recent calls for Canadians to adopt Ukraine-style armed resistance in the event of a U.S. invasion have also raised concerns. As covered in Global Green News, Pedneault suggested that Canada should take lessons from Ukraine and Scandinavian countries to mobilize civilians for armed defense, a stance that many have questioned given Ukraine’s heavy civilian death toll and mass territorial losses in its conflict with Russia.
Additionally, Pedneault’s support for NATO’s military agenda has been at odds with the Green Party’s traditional stance on peace, diplomacy, and nonviolence. His shift toward a militarized foreign policy, coupled with his push for domestic censorship, and arming of the civilian population has left many wondering how much of the Green Party’s values remain intact under his leadership.
The Bigger Picture
Pedneault’s call for censorship comes at a time when Canadian media and politicians have been accused of stifling dissenting voices on issues like Ukraine and Palestine. While his focus is on limiting Trump-aligned media, the broader implications of empowering the government to censor platforms could set a dangerous precedent.
By contrast, Lascaris’s consistent advocacy for free speech, diplomacy, and non-intervention positions him as a major critic of the current Green Party leadership. His remarks signal that resistance to Pedneault and May’s approach is growing—both inside and outside the party.
With Pedneault doubling down on a militarized, security-focused vision for Canada, Lascaris’s response raises an essential question:
Should Canada be preparing for war and censorship, or focusing on diplomacy and political independence?
Relates Global Green News Articles:
• Pedneault Calls for Sweeping Censorship in Response to Trump’s Canada Threat
• Pedneault Calls for Armed Resistance—Should Canada Really Follow Ukraine’s Path?
English (Canada) 
Français