Rumors are swirling that Jonathan Pedneault, co-leader of the Green Party of Canada, is operating without a single staff member assigned to him. A situation that bares astonishing resemblance to Quebec Solidaire’s struggle to implement a meaningful co-leadership model. If true, this revelation would help explain some of the bizarre and unpolished social media posts he has made—posts that we have covered extensively on Global Green News.
Without staff to advise, strategize, and refine his messaging, Pednault appears to be navigating the political landscape on his own, often with questionable results. From awkward endorsements to out-of-touch policy statements, his tenure so far has raised serious concerns about his preparedness for leadership.
It remains unclear as to why the party has yet to assign a staff member to assist Pedneault, especially since May has parliamentary, constituency and party staff assisting with her work. Why then is Pedneault left without staff in this critical pre election moment?
This news has Green Party supporters on edge as the novice politician is set to take part in the leaders debates in the federal election that could be held in just weeks.
Déjà Vu: A Leadership Model That Fails Its Junior Partner
Pedneault’s struggles closely mirror those of Émilise Lessard-Terrien, the former co-leader of Québec solidaire. Like Pedneault, she was elected to share leadership but quickly found herself in the shadows of her more experienced co-leader, Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois.
Lessard-Terrien, lacking a seat in the National Assembly, was sidelined in media appearances and party decision-making. Without a single staff member assigned to her and without a seat in parliament, she struggled to carve out her own political identity and eventually stepped down, leaving Nadeau-Dubois to dominate the party’s image.
The Green Party of Canada borrowed its leadership model from Québec solidaire, hoping that co-leadership would bring balance and collaboration. Instead, it has recreated the same structural weaknesses—where one leader, Elizabeth May, holds real power, while the other, Pednault, drifts without direction.
At a press conference held on Monday Pedneault stood behind May for the duration of the event without saying a single word. This unfortunate display of May’s dominance was disappointing to many Green Party members and likely to Pedneault himself who has struggled to get the recognition and visibility that theoretically comes with his position of co-leadership.
Can Pedneault Lead Effectively Without Staff?
The consequences of Pednault’s staffing vacuum are already apparent.
• His public statements have often lacked coherence and strategy, leading to confusion over the Green Party’s stance on key issues.
• His leadership role has been overshadowed by May, who continues to be the face and voice of the party.
• His engagement with social media has sometimes been cringe-inducing, poorly thought out, and at times out of step with Green Party supporters.
With no team behind him, Pednault may struggle even more as the party heads into an election cycle. If he is to play a real role in shaping the party’s future, he needs a staff, a strategy, and a clear purpose—none of which seem to be in place.
What’s Next for Pedneault?
With Pednault representing the Greens in the next federal leaders’ debates, his lack of support and preparation could prove disastrous. Facing seasoned political opponents like Pierre Poilievre he risks comming off as unprepared and unsupported by his own party apparatus and more dominant co-leader.
Unless the Green Party corrects course and ensures that both co-leaders are equally equipped to lead, it will remain trapped in a failed leadership experiment. The lack of staff assigned to Pedneault shows that the Green Party of Canada may be making the same mistakes as Quebec Solidaire did within their very similar co leadership structure and dynamics.
English (Canada) 
Français