Jonathan Pedneault, co-leader of the Green Party of Canada, recently took to social media to question the Trudeau government’s $1.3 billion deal with the U.S. to strengthen border security. However, while critiquing the cost just after saying that border security improvements are “long overdue” Pedneault suggested that Canada should manufacture military helicopters domestically rather than purchasing U.S.-made Blackhawks.
This stance, advocating for domestic weapons production, stands in stark contrast to the position of Alex Tyrrell, leader of the Green Party of Québec, who has campaigned for the closure of arms factories in Canada, arguing that weapons manufacturing perpetuates global conflict.
Two Visions for Canada’s Role in the Military-Industrial Complex
Pedneault’s tweet implies that Canada should focus on military self-sufficiency, questioning whether “helicopters we build here, providing good jobs to loyal Canadians” would be a better alternative to renting American-made aircraft. His argument, however, ignores a crucial question: Should Canada be making weapons at all?
Tyrrell, in contrast, has taken a firm stance against military manufacturing in Canada. During a campaign stop at the General Dynamics weapons plant in Quebec, Tyrrell called for its immediate closure, stating, “These factories manufacture bombs in times of peace as well as in times of war. They are an incentive to continue armed conflicts across the world.”
”We should not be expanding war factories or waisting our industrial capacity on bombs, fighter jets and military helicopters. Canada needs an energy transition. Those are good jobs! Canadians don’t want to work on building killing machines.
Alex Tyrrell – Leader of the Green Party of Québec
We need to shut down the military industrial complex and guarantee workers good jobs in the energy transition, retraining or even early retirement – I have proposed the same approach to tar sands and fossil fuel workers who are simply caught up in the system.”
Rather than investing in war industries, Tyrrell and the PVQ advocate for transitioning arms industry workers to sustainable industries, such as renewable energy. He argues that Quebec—and Canada as a whole—should strive to be a zone of peace rather than a participant in the global arms trade.
A Green Party Divided on Militarization
The Green Party of Canada has long positioned itself as a party of peace and diplomacy, yet Pedneault’s stance raises concerns about the direction of its leadership. The party’s controversial support for arming Ukraine, endorsed by Pedneault and Elizabeth May, already marked a significant departure from its previous pacifist positions.
Now, Pedneault’s focus on domestic arms production further distances the federal Greens from the anti-militarist stance of the Green Party of Quebec, which has consistently opposed weapons manufacturing and military expansion. Tyrrell’s call for peace aligns more closely with traditional Green values, raising questions about whether Pedneault’s vision is truly in line with what Green voters expect from their leaders.
As the Green Party continues to grapple with questions of leadership and direction, Pedneault’s stance on military production risks alienating voters who believe Canada’s role in the world should be one of diplomacy, not weapons manufacturing.
English (Canada) 
Français